There’s an argument to be made that it’s good for banks to fail from time to time. The longest stretch in US history without a bank failure was from 2004 to 2007, and, well, you know what happened after that. The overall banking industry is likely fine, and again, SVB probably would have made it through had everybody not freaked out at the same time. That said, SVB’s collapse isn’t great, especially for the people who are going to be stuck holding the bag. There continue to be concerns about the health of the broader banking system. If you work in tech, you had probably heard of Silicon Valley Bank before now.
What does Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse mean for the financial system?
SVB had $209 billion in assets and $175.4 billion in deposits at the time of failure, the FDIC said in a statement. Many of SVB’s depositors were technology workers and venture-capital backed companies. After the collapse, business owners have started to look at business banking a little differently, including using more than one financial institution to spread turkish lira to japanese yen out cash for protection and diversification. There is also a large demand for venture debt, as this was SVB’s specialty and finding the right funding may be more difficult. All deposits of SVB were transferred to the National Bank of Santa Clara, and insured depositors had access to their funds on March 13.
Bank run
Beyond tech, this caused some shakiness across the banking industry, especially regional banks, amid concerns that other banks could be in trouble or that contagion could set in. (It’s important to note for consumers here that, really, the money you have in the bank right now is almost definitely fine.) It also had ripple effects in Europe. SVB’s blowup is a big deal and a symptom of bigger forces in motion in tech, finance, and the economy. The FDIC created the National Bank of Santa Clara to protect insured depositors, who will have access to their insured deposits no later than Monday, March 13, the FDIC announced Friday. Banks only carry a portion of depositors’ money in cash – called a fractional reserve. This meant that SVB couldn’t give depositors their money because it was held in their long-term bond investments that were no longer worth as much.
In most cases, this would mean account holders would lose any money above that threshold. As this was happening, some of Silicon Valley Bank’s customers—many of whom are in the technology industry—hit financial troubles, and many began to withdraw funds from their accounts. While the FDIC has guaranteed deposits of up to $250,000, depending on the size of the company, that money wouldn’t go very far. This doesn’t just apply to companies that deposited cash with SVB — it’s also a question for companies using other SVB instruments, like revolver loans or credit cards. In a Monday speech, Biden insisted the government is not pursuing a taxpayer-funded bailout, stating “no losses will be borne by the taxpayers” and distinguishing his administration’s actions from the 2008 financial crisis bailout. As the bank grew to be the 16th largest in America, SVB invested their funds in long-term bonds when rates were near zero.
The bank had assets of about $209 billion in December 2022. O’Donnell says he told his portfolio companies to do the same. He says about a third of the 60-odd companies in his portfolio used SVB, and that by the end of Thursday, all except one had pulled their funds.
“Americans can have confidence that the banking system is safe,” Biden said at the White House. The fallout from Silicon Valley Bank’s failure prompted President Joe Biden to speak to taxpayer concerns from the White House today. But it ended up being the government, not investors, who came to depositors’ rescue. In short, SVB didn’t have the cash they needed to fulfill their obligations to their customers. As panicked withdrawal continued, a bank run was well-underway.
Are Credit Unions Safer Than Banks?
According to the WSJ, declaring the bank’s failure “ a threat to the financial system” now allows forex bollinger bands super reversal trading system with supporting adx indicator for some extra flexibility that wasn’t there before. SVB’s failure didn’t have anything directly to do with the ongoing crypto meltdown, but it could potentially worsen that crisis, too. Crypto firm Circle operates a stablecoin, USDC, that’s backed with cash reserves — $3.3 billion of which are stuck at Silicon Valley Bank. That stablecoin should always be worth $1, but it broke its peg after SVB failed, dropping as low as 87 cents.
Just two days prior, SVB signaled that it was facing a cash crunch. It first tried to raise money by selling shares and then it tried to sell itself, but the whole thing spooked investors, and ultimately, it went under. On Sunday, March 12, the federal government said it would step in to make sure all of the bank’s depositors would have access to their funds by Monday, March 13. Regulators also shuttered another bank, Signature Bank of New York, which had gotten into crypto, and the federal government said its depositors’ money would be guaranteed as well. Silicon Valley Bank was founded in 1983 in Santa Clara, California, and quickly became the bank for the burgeoning tech sector there and the people who financed it (as was its intention).
One year after the SVB collapse
- Essentially, these bankers managed to put themselves in double trouble, something a few short-sellers noticed (Pity the shorts! Despite being right, they’re also fucked because it’ll be hard to collect their winnings).
- That is how Silicon Valley Bank (svb), the 16th-largest lender in America, with about $200bn in assets, went bust.
- The FDIC usually will sell a failed bank’s assets to others.
The hard-hit tech sector first made news in late 2022 and early 2023 with mass layoffs. This collapse is another setback for the tech industry and is the biggest bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008. It used to be that you had to physically go to a bank to withdraw your money — or at least take the psychic damage of picking up a telephone. In this case, digitalization meant that the money went out so fast that Silicon Valley Bank was essentially helpless, points out Best stocks to buy fractional shares Samir Kaji, CEO of investing platform Allocate. Customers tried to withdraw $42 billion in deposits on March 9th alone — a quarter of the bank’s total deposits on a single day. In response to the collapse, the FDIC created a new entity, the Deposit Insurance National Bank of Santa Clara, for all insured deposits for Silicon Valley Bank.
Right now, rumors are flying in WhatsApp groupchats full of founders scrambling for cash. I suspect, too, that we’ll start seeing scammers attempting to target panicky technology brothers, to extract even more cash from them. That might be a lot of money for an individual, but we’re talking about companies here. A recent regulatory filing reveals that about 90 percent of deposits were uninsured as of December 2022. The FDIC says it’s “undetermined” how many deposits were uninsured when the bank closed.
Is the Fed even functioning?
While that leaves out shareholders and “certain” unsecured debt holders, it meant that the bank’s customers could mostly resume business on Monday. Even small disruptions to cash flow can have drastic effects on individuals, companies, and industries. So while one very likely outcome is that the uninsured depositors will eventually be made whole, the problem is that right now they have no access to that money. The bank’s failure served to remind us that there are several weaknesses within the banking system, including the lack of oversight for banks with less than $250 billion in assets.
If you’re not familiar with this seemingly regional bank, nobody’s blaming you. It had billions of dollars in deposits, but fewer than two dozen branches, and generally catered to a very specific crowd of startups, venture capitalists, and tech firms. Silicon Valley Bank ranked as the 16th-largest bank in the United States based on assets prior to its collapse. California-based Silicon Valley Bank was closed Friday morning by the state’s financial regulator, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation announced, becoming the largest bank to fail since the 2008 financial crisis.
Venture capitalists do too — often from family offices or governments. Silicon Valley Bank invested in a number of VCs over the years, including Accel Partners, Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia Capital, and Greylock. When news spread of regulators’ decision to make all depositors whole, many immediately wondered what that would mean for taxpayers. Ultimately, this risk of contagion could affect not just banks but the economy as a whole.
Large tech companies with significant cash in SVB include Etsy, Roblox, Rocket Labs and Roku. A lot of other banks are also losing money on their securities. But the gossipy nature of Silicon Valley, and the fact that so many of these firms are entwined, made the possibility of a bank run higher for SVB than it was for other places.
Some people already know their paychecks will be; a payroll service company called Rippling had to tell its customers that some paychecks weren’t coming on time because of the SVB collapse. For some workers, that’s rent or mortgage payments, and money for groceries, gas, or childcare that isn’t coming. That funding, the announcement said, will come from loans from the newly created Bank Term Funding Program.